In a report from a Japan-based user who recently received a Rebocap, I saw a package image with a TELEC sticker on it.
It seems that the number is only for the tracker and does not show the TELEC certification number for the receiver.
My guess is that the tracker and receiver are communicating bidirectionally and the receiver also needs to be TELEC certified and display the number.
Even if you are using a TELEC certified one such as ESP32 or nRF52, you still need to display the number.
I checked the documents uploaded to the TELEC Certification official website. There was an image of the tracker’s PCB (219-249127_02_003.pdf) in this document, but no image of the receiver’s PCB. Therefore, I don’t think the receiver is certified.
There was an image of the receiver’s PCB in the CE Certification. Looking at this, it seems to be a different board from the tracker’s PCB. If the tracker and receiver use the same PCB, I think one certification would be fine, but if they use different PCBs, I think the receiver also needs to get TELEC Certification.
If it is really necessary, we can add another certification. But can you give some examples? Because generally a product will only have one telec certification, it would be very strange if it has two.
We consulted professionals and they recommended that we add receiver certification, so we immediately applied for receiver certification, MIC ID: 219-249257, which will take about 4 to 6 weeks to be visible on the public website.
So don’t worry, there is no problem with the device itself, and if you buy and use it, you will not violate any laws.
By the way, the only time it involves consumer violations is when you use an ultra-high-power transmitter or use unauthorized frequency bands such as military frequency bands.
Here is an example where the certification number will be different for different products even if the RF circuit design is the same.Examples include the Raspberry Pi 3A+ and Raspberry Pi 3B+.
Both use the BCM4345/6 for the WiFi/Bluetooth chip. From the outside, they also appear to use the same antenna.
The 3A+ has been certified by TELEC as 007-AH0191, while the 3B+ has been certified as 007-AG0046, which are different products.
Here is an example of a single product that has multiple certification numbers.Meta Quest3 is one example. The certification number for the HMD itself is 201-230302, but the left and right controllers are also TELEC certified as 201-230303 and 201-230304, respectively.
Today, I called the MIC, Kanto Bureau of Telecommunications, which has jurisdiction over the area where I live, to inquire about the fact that the receiver is not TELEC certified. The person in charge said that the receiver should be TELEC certified as well as the tracker.
I’m glad that you understand my opinion.I look forward to the day when both the receiver and tracker are TELEC certified, properly display the ‘Technical Conformity’ mark, and can be used legally.
Thank you for your timely notification. We have taken corresponding measures. After the receiver certification is completed, we will reissue the telec certification mark for every user who purchased on the AliExpress platform. Both the receiver and the tracker will be reissued. Please stay tuned.
Subsequent products will have the TELEC certification mark affixed. [Although the receiver certification has not been completed, we are sure that it will pass technically. At the same time, the MIC ID number applied for has been issued. The number is certain.]